All work
Education · University of the Witwatersrand

Student success analytics and recommendations at Wits

Using data to help students and a university decide

A university holds a great deal of data about how students are doing. The work was turning it into something faculties and support staff could act on, early enough to matter.

What it is
Production system
Role
Data Scientist, Business Intelligence Services
Organisation
University of the Witwatersrand
Period
June 2018 to April 2020
Status
Completed
Built with
Topics
Student success analytics and recommendations at Wits: Using data to help students and a university decide

The problem

Business Intelligence Services was the university’s central analytics and reporting capability. It held a lot of institutional data, but the questions that mattered, which students may need support, which interventions help, what academic choices make sense, were hard to answer from reporting alone.

Why it mattered

South African university funding is tied to student progression and completion, so better decisions have both a human and an institutional consequence. Earlier visibility means support can be proactive rather than a response to a failure that has already happened.

The context

A central analytics function serving faculties, schools, planning and student-support staff, many of whom came from traditional institutional-research backgrounds rather than machine learning. Anything built had to be usable and maintainable by them.

What I did

I built analytics, reporting and machine-learning systems for university-wide institutional planning, student success and decision support, using Python, SQL, Power BI and statistical modelling. I developed student recommendation and progression analytics to help faculties and institutional teams see where students needed support, and built a clustering-based recommendation system for the Faculty of Humanities that linked analytical work to student progression and government subsidy outcomes. I also facilitated analytics and machine learning workshops for staff and students, so institutional researchers and analysts could adopt practical modelling in their own work and the capability did not sit with one central team.

What changed

Faculties, schools and planning gained useful information rather than raw institutional data, supporting earlier and better-targeted academic and support decisions. More than R2 million a year in government subsidy impact is attributed to the recommendation initiative.

Who benefited

Students, through better academic decisions and earlier support; faculty and planning staff, through visibility they could act on; and the staff and students trained in the workshops, who kept the skills.

What remained

Analytics and recommendation systems in institutional use, and trained people. This is where a pattern starts that runs through everything since: transfer the capability, do not just deliver the artefact.

Technical context

Python, SQL, clustering and recommendation methods, Power BI reporting and analytics workflows.

Related work

Related writing

Talks